I support over 3000 clinicians in heterogeneous sites of care - solo practitioners, small offices, multi-specialty facilities, community hospitals, academic medical centers, and large group practices.
In every location there is some level of dissatisfaction with their EHR. Complaints about usability, speed of documentation, training, performance, and personalization limitations are typical. Most interesting is that users believe the grass will be greener by selecting another EHR.
I've heard from GE users who want Allscripts, eClinicalworks users who want Epic, Allscripts users who want AthenaHealth, and NextGen users who want eClinicalWorks.
The bottom line from every product I've used and everyone I've spoken with is that there is no current "perfect" EHR. We're still very early in the EHR maturity lifecycle.
What is the perfect EHR? I've written about my best thinking, which has been incorporated into the BIDMC home built record, webOMR. (and has dissatisfied users too)
However, after listening to many "grass is greener" stories, I believe that what a provider perceives as a better EHR often represents trade offs in functionality. One EHR may have better prescribing functionality while another has better letters, another is more integrated and another has better support. The "best" EHRs, according to providers, varies by what is most important to that individual provider/practice, which may not be consistent with enterprise goals or the needs of an Accountable Care Organization.
My experience is that organizations which have given clinicians complete freedom of EHR choice now have an unintegrated melange of different products that make care standardization impossible.
My advice - pick an EHR for your enterprise that meets your strategic goals, providing the greatest good for the greatest number. Apply a maximum effort to training, education, sharing of lessons learned, user engagement, and healthcare information exchange.
There will always be dissatisfaction and a claim that something is better. However, I've never seen a change in product fix workflow and process issues. BIDMC's strategy is to do our best to ensure providers are educated and use their EHR optimally. I do not believe that there is a better choice than our current mix of built and bought products that makes sense for our pioneer ACO and individual providers within the organization.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
3:00 AM
dssadsds
No comments
Related Posts:
The Return on Investment of Administrative SimplificationSince 1997, the New England Healthcare Exchange Network (NEHEN), a non-profit run by stakeholder board members, has provided community-wide collaborative payer-provider administrative transaction exchange for a fixed subscrip… Read More
Our Cancer Journey Week 29Kathy completes radiation therapy on July 31. On that date she moves from cancer patient to cancer survivor. I have only two more posts to write about this segment of our journey - Week 30 and Week 31.At t… Read More
Hospital Disaster PlanningIn my role as CIO and a Professor of Medicine, I'm asked many questions about the policies, processes, and procedures of healthcare. Here's one I was recently asked about Hospital Disaster planning. Meg Femino, BIDMC D… Read More
Cool Technology of the WeekToday's post is not about current cool technologies, but those that were cool. I feel nostalgic for my IBM XT with a 5 megabyte hard drive, my Motorola brick phone, my 5 1/4 floppy collection, my Atari console and my E… Read More
Creative Uses of Active RFIDBIDMC implemented enterprise-wide Active RFID asset tracking over 5 years ago. Initially this was done to reduce theft of wheelchairs, optimize the use of high inventory multi-departmental equipment such as ventilators/ekg ma… Read More
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment